Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • BYL-719 AMPK is a cellular energy

    2023-11-14

    AMPK is a cellular energy sensor that is phosphorylated in response to high intracellular ADP levels to increase GLUT4 translocation into the cell, and subsequently, increase intracellular glucose levels to provide substrate to replenish ATP levels [25]. In metabolic syndrome, sequestration of plasma glucose is impaired through typical insulin signaling, making AMPK-mediated signaling of particular interest as an alternate route for cellular glucose entry [16,36]. The statically and robustly elevated levels of AMPK phosphorylation (activation) in insulin resistant OLETF rats suggests that increased AMPK phosphorylation may try to compensate for the impaired insulin signaling pathway, and further indication of the metabolic derangement associated with OLETF rats. As expected, the acute glucose challenge suppressed AMPK phosphorylation in LETO and OLETF in the first hour; however, ARB treatment stabilized AMPK activation in response to the glucose, which is a unique observation and demonstrates the importance of stable AT1 signaling in the maintenance of proper glucose regulation.
    Acknowledgements
    Introduction The renin angiotensin system (RAS) exerts both hormonal and paracrine effects, modulating blood pressure regulation, among others. Clinical and basic findings demonstrate major sex differences in the way males and females respond to stimulation and inhibition of the RAS under physiological and pathophysiological circumstances (Brown et al., 2012, Sullivan, 2008, Xue et al., 2005) Differences in angiotensin peptides and receptors in males and females have been hypothesized to be one of the potential mechanisms contributing to sex-specific differences in cardiovascular homeostasis; which highlights the importance of studying basal BYL-719 and kidney RAS complements (Sandberg and Ji, 2012). Ang II effects include a wide range of actions on the kidney, heart, blood vessels and adrenal gland in physiological and pathophysiological states. Furthermore, angiotensin peptides exert modulatory effects on the central nervous system, both in brain areas lacking the blood-brain-barrier (circulating Ang II-responders) as well as in brain areas in which Ang II is locally produced. Ang II binds to two G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes, AT1 and AT2, exerting opposing and counterbalancing effects on the cardiovascular system. The classic excitatory effects evoked by Ang II (vasoconstriction, aldosterone and vasopressin release, sodium reabsorption, increased sympathetic activity and vascular growth) result from AT1 stimulation, whereas AT2 activation causes vasodilation, natriuresis, and anti-proliferation effects, thus opposing the vasoconstrictor and antinatriuretic effects of AT1-Ang II mediated responses (Carey et al., 2001, Li et al., 2003, Kaschina and Unger, 2003, Sandberg and Ji, 2000). Furthermore, Ang(1–7) mediates vasodilation via the AT2 receptor or its own receptor, the Mas receptor (Kaschina and Unger, 2003, Santos et al., 2003). Earlier studies showed differences in the ratio of AT1 to AT2 and Mas receptor expression between males and females (Sampson et al., 2012a, Sampson et al., 2012b, Silva-Antonialli et al., 2004), which may account for some of the Ang II-related sex differences associated with vasoconstrictor/vasodilator balance of the RAS. This leads to the question of what makes males and females different? Exposure to sex steroids during critical periods of development can induce organizational (long-lasting or permanent) effects on sexually dimorphic traits. Sex steroids can also impart (temporary or reversible) activational effects at different times of life (during neonatal and peripubertal development as well as in adulthood) to cause most of the known sex differences in phenotype (Arnold and Gorski, 1984, McCarthy et al., 2012, Morris et al., 2004). For a long time, the organizational-activational dichotomy was applied to the understanding of many sex differences, and hormones were the only factors discussed as proximate signals causing sex differences. However, males and females differ not only in their sex (males are born with testes- and females with ovaries-hormonal factors) but also carry different sex chromosome complements (SCC: XY and XX respectively) and thus are influenced throughout life by different genomes. Exciting new data indicate that some genes escape X-inactivation and are expressed from both the “active” and “inactive” X chromosome, which may cause functional sex differences intrinsic to male (XY) and female (XX) cells, potentially contributing to sex differences in traits (sex-biased genes) (Carrel and Willard, 2005; Wolstenholme et al., 2013, Yang et al., 2006).